The Real Statistics Resource Pack provides an option for identifying potential outliers in a sample. Assuming the sample is normally distributed (based on the Central Limit Theorem), we know that 1−NORMSDIST(2.5) = 0.621% of the data should have a z-score larger than 2.5 or less than -2.5. Here we use 2.5 as a somewhat arbitrary criteria for a potential outlier. E.g. for a sample of size 80, on average 80(.00621)(2) = .994, or about one, element will be viewed as a potential outlier.
Real Statistics Data Analysis Tool: One of the options of the Descriptive Statistics and Normality data analysis tool provided in the Real Statistics Resource Pack is the identification of potential outliers using a specified z-score (default 2.5).
Example 1: Identify potential outliers for the three data samples on the left side of Figure 1 (range B3:D16).
Figure 1 – Identifying potential outliers and missing data
Enter Ctrl-m and select the Descriptive Statistics and Normality data analysis tool. Fill in the dialog box that appears as shown in Figure 2. We leave the Outlier Limit field blank since we want to use the default value of 2.5.
Figure 2 – Dialog box for Descriptive Statistics and Normality
The output as displayed in Figure 1 shows there are two potential outliers (indicated by the asterisks in column N): namely item 9 of Sample 3 and item 12 of Sample 2. Item 9 of Sample 3 has a z-score of -2.52391 (cell N17), which is less than -2.5. Item 12 of Sample 2 has a z-score of 2.62457 (cell M20), which is greater than 2.5. Item 4 of Sample 1 is just under the 2.5 threshold with a z-score of 2.424183.
Note that the z-scores are calculated in the usual way: e.g. the z-score for item 1 of Sample 1 (cell L9) is calculated by the formula =STANDARDIZE(B4, L4, L5).
We can also see evidence of potential outliers in the long tails in the Box plots for Sample 2 and 3.
Note that just because a data element is identified as a potential outlier doesn’t mean that it is wrong or should be eliminated, but it does mean that that data element should be investigated to see if a typing mistake has been made or some other problem has occurred that will distort any analyses that are undertaken.
The output also totals up the number of blank cells (2 for Sample 3) and non-numeric cells (1 for Sample 2, indicated by a series of asterisks). These can represent potential missing data. See Dealing with Missing Data for how to deal with missing data.
Observation: Another popularly used method for identifying outliers is to denote any data element larger than Q3 + 1.5*IQR or smaller than Q1 – 1.5*IQR as a potential outlier, where Q1 and Q3 are the first and third quartiles (see Ranking) and IQR is the inter-quartile range (see Measures of Variability).
Real Statistics Function: The Real Statistics Resource Pack provides the following function, where if type = 0 then the test using the mean and standard deviation is employed while if type = 1 then the test using the IQR is employed.
STANDARD(x, R1, type, exc) takes the value
STANDARDIZE(x, x̄, s) | if type = 0 (default) | |
(x−Q3)/IQR | if type = 1 and x > Q3 | |
(x−Q1)/IQR | if type = 1 and x < Q1 | |
0 | otherwise (type = 1 and Q1 ≤ x ≤ Q3) |
where x̄ = AVERAGE(R1) and s = STDEV(R1).
If exc = TRUE then Q1 = QUARTILE.EXC(R1,1) and Q3 = QUARTILE.EXC(R1,3)
If exc = FALSE (default) then Q1 = QUARTILE.INC(R1,1) and Q3 = QUARTILE.INC(R1,3)
The STANDARD function plays a role similar to the STANDARDIZE function when type = 0 (except that the mean and standard deviation are calculated from R1). It plays the equivalent role using the median and IQR when type = 1.
For type = 0, if the value of the STANDARD function at x is larger than 2.5 or less than -2.5 we can consider x to be a potential outlier (although we can change 2.5 to 3.0 or some other value as we choose).
Similarly for type = 1, if the value of the STANDARD function at x is larger than 1.5 or less than -1.5 we can consider x to be a potential outlier (although we can change 1.5 to some other value as we choose).
Example 2: Identify potential outliers for the data set in range B3:D8 of Figure 3.
We insert the formula =STANDARD(B3,$B$3:$D$8) in cell F3, highlight the range F3:H8 and press Ctrl-R and Ctrl-D to fill in the range F3:H8 with the values shown in Figure 3. If we set a cutoff of ±2.5 for outliers, we see that the only value exceeding the cutoff is 2.816972 (cell H5), which means that the data element 99.5 (cell D5) is a potential outlier.
Figure 3 – Identifying potential outliers using the STANDARD function
If we use the type 1 approach instead of the type 0 approach, we insert the formula =STANDARD(B3,$B$3:$D$8,1) in cell J3, highlight the range J3:L8 and press Ctrl-R and Ctrl-D to fill in the range J3:L8 with the values shown in Figure 3. If we set a cutoff of ±1.5 for outliers, we see that the only values exceeding the cutoff are 4.315335 (cell L5) and -2.36501 (cell J8), which means that the data elements 99.5 (cell D5) and 10.6 (cell B8) are potential outliers.
Note that values in the range B3:D8 between Q1 (37.975) and Q3 (49.55) take a zero value in range J3:L8.
Observation: Another approach to identifying outliers uses the Grubbs’ test.
Very useful info and detailed even for a beginner. Thank you for the Add-In, much appreciated for ist complexity.
Is there a way to plot outliers outside the box plot? Currently the box plot includes outliers in the range.
Pandley,
So far I have not found a way to do this in Excel, except for Excel 2016 which has a built-in boxplot chart capability.
Charles
I see. I think it might be possible in following way:
1. User selects outlier limit to identify outliers before doing ‘descriptive statistics and normality’.
2. Once identified, outliers are separated from the original data. So we identify three data sets now:
A) Original dataset
B) Dataset containing outliers only
C) Dataset containing original data with outliers removed
3. Make a box plot with dataset C. Then plot dataset B as separate series in the same chart (as a scatter plot). This way we may end up with
I have performed this manually but it gets tedious with large number of outliers. I think this will further enhance this wonderful add-in.
I think I did not mention clearly that in step 3, each row of outlier data has to be plotted as seperate scatter plot data series.
Pandey,
What is the purpose of data set B?
Charles
Dear Sir
First make a box plot with data set C (data set containing original data with “outliers removed”).
Then,
Data set B is the data set containing “outliers only”. To plot outliers in your scheme of box plot, each row of outlier data (data set B) has to be plotted as separate data series as scatter plot.
On performing both steps above, we will end up with a box plot with outliers lying outside the box plot. Hope I was clear.
Pandey,
Thank you very much for suggesting this approach. It makes sense and I will try to implement it.
Charles
Has anyone used 2.5 instead of 1.5 as the factor to use on IQR to identify outliers
Is There a way to just reach the number of outliers with out calculating the standard data array? I mean a formula which tell us how many outliers are there in an array!
regards
Sohard,
The problem is that there are many formulas for calculating the number of outliers. Each depends on your definition of what is an outlier. E.g. if you define an outlier to be a data element that is more than 3 standard deviations from the mean, then you can use the formula:
=COUNTIF(R1,”>”&AVERAGE(R1)+3*STDEV(R1))+COUNTIF(R1,”<"&AVERAGE(R1)-3*STDEV(R1)) where R1 is the data array. Charles
Hello,
What is R1 the up mentioned? I couldn’t understand it. Thank you very much your answers.
Elcin
Elcin, sorry but I don’t what you are referring to when you say “R1 the up”.
Charles